Do you ever wonder what would happen if a virus emerged
somewhere that had the ability to kill most of the people on
earth? Writer Scott Burns and director Steven Soderbergh attempt to answer that
question in the movie Contagion.
Contagion is not one of those typical killer disease
outbreak horror flicks where someone contracts a blood oozing-like virus and
the army comes in to quarantine the entire community and kill everyone before
it can spread. Instead, we
see an almost documentary-like account of what an epidemic looks like through
the eyes of public health professionals and how our government and the public
would likely respond to a killer virus invasion.
What most people who watched the movie (and reviews I have
read) do not realize is that the writer Scott Burns and director Steven
Soderbergh basically took the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service’s
Pandemic Influenza Plan and brought it to life. I
really didn’t think it was possible to make that plan entertaining (it’s
excruciatingly dry reading). The other thing this movie does with realistic precision is
capturing the challenges a public health professional faces implementing the plan during an outbreak.
For example, a central element of the storyline involves Center for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) officials competing with the purveyors of
pseudoscience to communicate their message in a 24-hour news cycle/twitter/
internet blogger world. We see the CDC
officials meeting with stakeholders (e.g., local governments, schools) and we experience the obstacles officials face establishing quarantines and vaccine
priorities on a population that has been brainwashed to hate/mistrust the
government.
Contagion is also an epidemiological mystery. The storyline starts with Beth (Gwenyth
Paltrow) catching a typical cold that untypically kills her. Her death draws
the attention of the CDC, others victims are discovered and the outbreak
investigation is on. However, its how Contagion weaves the systematic steps of an epidemiological investigation, including the hypothesis development, into
the storyline that is most interesting. Title cards are used to frame each day
of the outbreak’s development and give the audience context for subtle visual
clues as to what caused the outbreak. The movie ends by taking the viewer back
to day 1 of the outbreak and if you were paying attention, all those visual
clues come together to reveal the origin of the virus. They are the
same kind of clues a health inspector would use during a real outbreak.
2 comments:
This review makes me want to wash my hands when I leave the theater!
Movies like this make you wonder why people take our health inspectors for granted.
Post a Comment